Volume 18, Issue 1 (3-2025)
IJMEHM 2025, 18(1): 1-16 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Samouei R, Samouei S, Meshkineh N. Design and Psychometric Evaluation of a Questionnaire on Factors Associated with Unethical Research Practices among Faculty Members and Researchers in the Ministry of Health. IJMEHM 2025; 18 (1) : 7
URL: http://ijme.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6848-en.html
URL: http://ijme.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6848-en.html
1- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2- Department of Sports Physiology, School of Sports Sciences, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3- Master of Data Science, University of Verona, Italy
2- Department of Sports Physiology, School of Sports Sciences, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran
3- Master of Data Science, University of Verona, Italy
Abstract: (1241 Views)
Faculty members and researchers bear the greatest responsibility for producing scientific research outputs due to the nature of their profession and mission. Given the role of ethical principles in ensuring evidence-based research, their impact on research utilization in society, and the importance of scientific evaluations, this study was conducted to design and psychometrically evaluate a questionnaire on factors related to unethical research practices among researchers. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2024 among faculty members and researchers at medical sciences universities in Iran. Based on a preliminary qualitative study, 40 items were initially generated for the questionnaire. The validity of the questionnaire was assessed through face validity, content validity (CVR, CVI), and criterion validity (divergent and convergent). Besides, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and reliability testing (Cronbach's alpha) were performed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficient, and Student's t-test. During the content validity assessment, 11 researchers evaluated the items. Applying cutoff scores of 0.59 for CVR and 0.79 and above for CVI, 16 out of 40 items were removed, retaining 24 items. Exploratory factor analysis revealed five key factors, including “researchers’ irresponsible and unprofessional behaviors and beliefs”, “inefficient basis for competition and career advancement among researchers”, “lack of awareness and up-to-date knowledge among researchers”, “inefficient organizational culture and policies”, and “lack of supervision over researchers and research”. Descriptive findings indicated significant differences in the mean scores of factors associated with unethical research practices of researchers by gender (P=0.002) and organizational position (P=0.004), but not by education level. The findings from this study confirmed the strong psychometric properties of the questionnaire on factors related to unethical research practices.
Article number: 7
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Ethics in Research
Received: 2025/01/13 | Revised: 2025/07/22 | Accepted: 2025/05/10 | Published: 2025/03/21
Received: 2025/01/13 | Revised: 2025/07/22 | Accepted: 2025/05/10 | Published: 2025/03/21
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
