Showing 18 results for Saleh
Seyyed Abdolsaleh Jafari Kermanshah, Behin Aramineya, Ahmad Fayyazbakhsh,
Volume 3, Issue 5 (12-2010)
Abstract
Seyyed Abd-Al-Saleh Jafari, Behin Araminia, Ahmad Fayazbakhsh, Alireza Bagheri,
Volume 4, Issue 1 (12-2010)
Abstract
The most basic research in the area of human science is the research about human beings and people, while the first introduction to the immense concept of people is facing independence towards defining this concept because we feel the instances of it every day. Lack of attention in human recognition can prevent us from reaching generalized results and therefore, will lead us to transient decisions. But in fact there are some trembling parts towards human recognition, like getting far from the definition of concept, the inseparability of living species from each other up to dismissing the reality of specie's existence, a quick glance to the challenges of extraverts, ambiguity of biological definitions (morphological, fertilization, genetical and behavioral) and also lack of logical definitions.
From our point of view, there is no pervasive criterion about humanistic living therefore, the rights and characteristics which we consider for human beings are related to the humanistic living from a philosophical view point. To attach this expansion, the philosophical human beings and its differences are incorporated into the minimal human. It is clear that there is no incorporation the same as this rule and we should overcome some steps about them, if not, this incorporation will get beyond the philosophical control of human. In a steady view, what makes a difference from human beings and other creatures is not the biological definition of them, while in the approval view sometimes this definition is the only tool to separate the people. Autonomy and free choice are the exact criterion for this recognition.
Majid Nimroozi, Alireza Salehi, Abdolali Mohagheghzadeh, Hossein Kiani, Mohammadhadi Imanieh, Mahmood Nejabat,
Volume 4, Issue 1 (12-2010)
Abstract
The medical Arjuze is one of the less known works of Avicenna, a great Iranian scientist and physician, which is written didactically in Arabic. In this book, Avicenna has composed 1326 lines about a complete cycle of traditional medicine of Iran in Arabic in the form of battle cry. Didactic poetry is one of the poetry forms which its main purpose is to provide educational aims and to convey scientific terms both in literature and poetical way. Avicenna's poetry in Arjuze is simple and fluent. The medical topics are overviewed in a sketchy way and not in full details in this book. In this book, theoretical and practical medicines are explained in two specific parts.
The existence of French and English translations of Arjuze shows the value of this work for Europeans as a complete outline about medicine in that time, but there is no Persian translation of this work, available. Traditional Medicine and History of Medicine Research Centre of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences has started the translation of medical Arjuze with the aim of introducing this precious work which shows the educational pattern of traditional Iranian scientists in using didactic poetry.
The purpose of this article is to introduce the characteristics of Avicenna's Arjuze with an overview of his position in modern traditional medicine.
Seyyed Mahdi Salehi, Fatemeh Faramarzi Razini , Nazafarin Ghasemzadeh,
Volume 6, Issue 3 (8-2013)
Abstract
Presumption of innocence is one of the fundamental principles of criminal law that has its roots in moral and religious principles. Presumption of innocence is consistent with human nature, and special attention has been paid to it in Islam. For this reason it has been included in our constitutional law as well as in the constitutions and ordinary laws of other nations, and this indicates its significance. In Shiite jurisprudence there are two major theories on the responsibility of physicians as “daman al-tabib”. Most jurists (famous) consider the physician responsible even if he or she has committed no fault. Only a minority of jurists (less-known) consider the physician to have no responsibility. Islamic criminal law believes the physician to have absolute liability, although medical practices have become more sensitive than in the past and medical incidents have increased as a result of new technology and new methods of treatment. The present study intends to adopt a new approach to rules and principles of jurisprudence, and study the necessity of using them according to the requirements of time in solving everyday problems. Moreover, the study seeks ways to prevent the regression of those rules. Therefore, it seems essential that the golden principle of presumption of innocence be applied to physicians as the manifestation of God's healing, and more attention be paid to it.
Fatemeh Keshmiri, Amirali Sohrabpou, Shervin Farahmand, Farhad Soltani Arabshahi, Farhad Shah, Narges Saleh, Mandana Shiraz,
Volume 6, Issue 4 (10-2013)
Abstract
In order to achieve teamwork-based and integrated care, one of the issues in health care is the implementation of ethics and values in teamwork. The aim of this study is to develop the interprofessional collaborative ethics framework.This cross sectional study was conducted in two phases. In phase one, core competencies of the interprofessional collaborative ethics were determined by literature review. In phase two, Delphi rounds of experts were undertaken to validate the competencies and calculate content validity indexes through Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI).The interviews and Delphi rounds identified 12 competencies categorized in three core themes including patient-centered values, interprofessional collaborative ethics, and team-based values. In phase two, based on the mean scores of importance, utility, and clarity, patient center value (4.9), interprofessional ethics competencies (4.6), and team-based values (4.5) were determined as essential themes.In conclusion, the validation of the inter-professional ethics framework was found to be acceptable in the Iranian context. Therefore, the framework for teaching and evaluating inter-professional ethical competencies is an applicable tool in the Iranian context.
Nazafarin Ghasemzadeh, Fatemeh Faramarzi Razini, Salman Alipour Ghoshchi, Seyed Mehdi Salehi,
Volume 7, Issue 4 (11-2014)
Abstract
Recent provisions to the Islamic Penal Code have provided favorable regulations that absolve the skilled physician from absolute liability and adjust liability according to fault. The revised code adopts a new approach by allowing physicians more freedom while providing added protection, which is consistent with ethical standards and Jurisprudential principles. The present paper aimed to investigate the development process of statutory laws in Iran regarding medical liability and at the same time analyze articles of the Islamic Penal Code of 2013 on the subject. Some articles have been found to contain ambiguities that need to be modified. As an instance there seems to be a conflict between Article 492 and Clause 1 of Article 496 that should be resolved as it pertains to a case of the cause and the perpetrator (physician and nurse). In these situations the doctor orders and the nurse acts, and it is therefore necessary and proper that physicians not be absolved from liability.
Seyed Abdolsaleh Jafarey, Behin Araminia, Ahmad Fayaz-Bakhsh,
Volume 7, Issue 5 (1-2015)
Abstract
The nature of human dignity is among the most basic queries about the essence of humanity, and research in this area can produce results that may be applied to various health related topics. There is a need for defining comprehensive criteria for the bio-human in order to protect human rights and other values that are attributable to human biology.The present paper first attempts to determine whether abstraction is the base of human dignity, as opposed to contraction. The authors argue that the former may not be the case, as dignity is value-based and therefore implicates moral orders. Such issues cannot be abstracted from external existence, so one can assume contraction to be the base of human dignity. In that case, contraction requires a contractor or an origin for contraction. Self-contracted values are invalid and worthless, and by the same token, external existences are incapable of dignity. Therefore, a stable contractor is required to justify stability and the native essence of contracted dignity, and only God can be that stable, conscious, senior contractor.Among the criteria for dignity, the authors focus on those essential characteristics that differentiate humans from other organisms, and argue that these could be considered as the basis for dignity.
Seyed Abdolsaleh Jafarey, Behin Araminia, Ahmad Fayaz-Bakhsh,
Volume 7, Issue 6 (3-2015)
Abstract
The criteria for human dignity are among the most important topics associated with the concept. Some related questions are what makes man worthy of dignity, and what properties make him more dignified than other creatures? Although biological classifications of species should be considered in humanities, research on dignity must focus on differences that are fundamental and separate humans from all other species. Morphological, genetic and communal differences cannot be the criteria for dignity, and behaviors are subject to individual outlooks. This manner of reasoning guided scholars to categorize humans on the basis of wisdom, but the author of the present article believes that wisdom cannot be the criterion for dignity. There is a degree of intelligence and wisdom in other creatures that is not sufficient to make a fundamental differentiating factor. Like other faculties, wisdom may be regarded as an instrument for a better life. The authors believes that the “authority” to choose (that is, free will) is the essential difference between humans and other creatures because the latter are driven only by their structures or needs. This authority enables people to choose between good and bad or desirable and undesirable, and shapes most human values. Consequently, this authority creates the basis for dignity and any given type of choice passes its value on to the chooser.
Behzad Foroutan, Moussa Abolhassani, Sajad Salehipour, Adnan Karimi, Fariba Dehghanizadeh, Nastran Rezvani, Mohammad Soltani Beldaji,
Volume 8, Issue 4 (11-2015)
Abstract
Ethics is important in all professions, particularly in nursing, since morality and commitment in nurses can play a significant role in improving patients’ health and recovery. The nursing profession is therefore rooted in ethics, and the observance of nursing ethics is more important than other aspects of health care. This study aimed to determine patient's views on standards of professional ethics in nursing practice in Imam Hussain Hospital during 2015.
This was a cross-sectional study conducted on 575 patients in different wards of Imam Hussein Hospital in Shahroud. Research instrument was a 22-item questionnaire designed by the researchers to evaluate nurses’ observance of professional ethics in the three dimensions of accountability, improvement of care quality, and respect for patients. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 20 software.
The mean age of participants in this study was 51.32 (± 19.03), and 299 participants (52%) were male. The mean total score of professionalism was 18.38 (± 2.74), and the relationship between age and observance of professional ethics was statistically significant (P = 0.006).
According to the subjects of this study, the nurses’ observance of professional ethics was relatively good and at a desirable level. It is recommended to utilize a variety of learning styles and employ the services of professors of nursing ethics in order to enhance the quality of nursing education with respect to professional ethics.
Mansoureh Ashghali Farahani, Tahmine Salehi, Zahra Arab Ameri, Fatemeh Hajibabaee, Agha Fatemeh Hosseini, Fatemeh Ghaffari,
Volume 9, Issue 4 (10-2016)
Abstract
Empathy is a necessary condition for an effective nursing care. An empathetic relationship between nurse and patients leads to positive treatment outcomes and moral sensitivity among students in clinical and educational environments. This study was conducted in 2014 to determine the level of empathy among nursing students and its relationship with their demographic data. A cross-sectional study (Descriptive analysis) was undertaken using paper-based versions of the Jefferson Scale of nursing Empathy. By using stratified random sampling, 320 undergraduate students from the first to forth-year of their program in Tehran University of Medical Sciences were selected.
The result shows that participants reported good empathy levels, and the average of empathy score was 103 ±11. Empathy scores increased with increasing academic year. There was a significant relationship between sex and empathy. Students who did not passed the effective communication course scored higher than their counterparts. Empathy score increased with age, and older students recorded higher scores than their younger colleagues. Single and employed students recorded higher empathy scores than married and unemployed students.
There were no significant differences between the place of living (dormitory versus personal house), Interest in nursing education as well as their marks.
Regarding the relationship between empathy with students’ academic years, the finding offers insights into the importance of incorporating and promoting empathy in nursing curricula from the first year of training.
In addition, it is necessary to pay more attention to teaching empathy to male students.
Fateme Faramarzi Razini, Seyyed Mahdi Salehi, Seyyed Mahdi Ghoreishi, Amir Hamzeh Salarzaee, Nazafarin Ghasemzadeh,
Volume 9, Issue 4 (10-2016)
Abstract
Reproduction and fertility are considered a substantial need for the survival of the human race and has seen its ups and downs. Advances in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ARTs) have brought some changes as well as challenge in human reproduction. For instance, involvement of a third-party in pregnancy has become a challenging practice. Given the rapid application of ARTs in Iran, obscure aspects and consequences associated with this technology need to be elaborated. The present study aimed at investigating the identity and rights of children resulting from ARTs based on the existing laws and the opinions of the contemporary Shi’ite Grand Ayatollahs. First, by reviewing the sources of Islamic law as well as searching the legal and reliable electronic resources -using key terms such as parentage, guardianship, embryo donation and infertility- the existing laws and regulations about ARTs have been analyzed. Then, by a qualitative method, written opinions of some contemporary Shi’ite Grand Ayatollahs regarding the identity and the rights of a child born by involvement of a third party were collected. The result shows inconsistency between the opinion of the contemporary Islamic jurists and the existing law about embryo donation. Islamic Jurists believe that the child of embryo donation does not belong to the recipient couple. However, according to the Embryo Donation Act, in particular with regard to the duties placed upon infertile couples, who receive the donated embryo, implicitly accept the recipient couple as the parents of the child. This eventually leaves the child with an identity crisis besides deprivation of citizenship rights in some cases. Accordingly, as the current rules and legislations of Iran conflicts with views of the Islamic jurists, to resolve this problem, a revision to accept the recipients as legal parents of the child is necessary.
Shilan Ghaderi, Mehran Sadeghi, Fayegh Yousefi, Mohammad Saleh Vahedi, Nader Karami, Aram Karimian,
Volume 12, Issue 0 (3-2019)
Abstract
One of the main methods of improving patient safety is use of reporting systems and providing facilities for analyzing and preventing mistakes. The aim of this study was to determine the attitude of nursing managers of hospitals affiliated to Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences towards the voluntary reporting system of medical errors in 2015. In this descriptive-analytic study, all managers of selected hospitals in Kurdistan province were enrolled in this study. The data was collected through a valid questionnaire for attitude towards the voluntary reporting system of medical errors. Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 20, independent t-test, chi - square and ANOVA. According to the results of the study, 87.9% (80 participants) of the managers encountered reporting of errors in their workplace. 68.1% (62 participants) of the managers had a positive attitude toward the voluntary system of medical errors and 16.15 % (15 participants) had a negative attitude and 15.38% (14 participants) were indifferent. According to the results of the research, more than 68.1 % of managers have a positive attitude towards the voluntary reporting of medical errors and with the necessary measures a suitable platform for launching the voluntary reporting system of medical errors in the treatment centers can be provided.
Seyed Mohsen Sadat Akhavi, Hamid Reza Salehi,
Volume 12, Issue 0 (3-2019)
Abstract
The mutual trust in a social relationship is essential to adjusting that relationship under ethics and law. The functionality of legal and ethical rules can be trusted to create a good, orderly and just relationship when the parties can trust each other under the protection of such rules. The first legal documents in Iran required the practitioner to obtain the respect and trust of the society in himself and his colleagues, and then made clear his obligation under it. In subsequent reforms, such obligation stood as they were, but the values of “trust” and “respect” were not mentioned. It seems that “trust” and “respect” of physicians in a society is the good will of these professionals which supports the efficiency of the treatment on one hand, and the conscious cooperation of the patient on the other. This matter is dependent on the physician’s effort in respecting the patient’s boundary and staying true to the physicians own technical and professional obligations. This article emphasizes the necessity this inseparable relationship, and the analysis of legal obligation in the light of such higher ethical values.
Seyed Abdosaleh Jafari , Seyed Abolhasan Navab, Bagher Talebi Darabi, Behin Arami Nia,
Volume 15, Issue 1 (3-2022)
Abstract
“Koran” had affirmed “Human Dignity” but in other verse, it had mentioned “Caliphate/Substitution” and “Deposit” about human in comparison with other creatures that they had difficult and covered interpretations. “The choice of good and evil” as Human Dignity criterion, makes it easy and transparent.
“Deposit” verse says Human accepts Deposit and others refuse it because of 2 adjectives: “Zaloom” and “Jahool” from roots of oppression and ignorance. Interpretations are different in meaning this adjective and their relation to deposit. If deposit is choosing, it can make oppression and justice and knowledge and ignorance. Then “FAOOL” structure in Arabic can show potency of action/adjective. Thus, they mean potent for oppression and ignorance like justice and knowledge. It means choosing potency, not actual ugliness.
In “Caliphate” verse, angels say to God that Human creation tend to corruption and killing. God hadn’t refused it but had referred to an upper knowledge. If Caliphate is good choosing too along justice and knowledge, angels had seen properly contemporaneous ignorance and oppression and corruption and killing but they couldn’t recognize the difference between good free discretion and their algebraic goodness that is caliphate and moral similarity and free worship of God with Lordship essence.
Tahmine Salehi ,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics (Oral Presentation) 2024)
Abstract
Ethical considerations have been underemphasized in health system policymaking compared to areas like clinical ethics and biomedical research. Allocating resources effectively, promoting equitable access, and resolving societal needs within the health system necessitate robust ethical frameworks. Neglecting these frameworks creates significant dilemmas and challenges. An analysis of health system policymaking and macro-decision-making reveals a pervasive disregard for systemic ethical thinking. A primary ethical dilemma stems from conflicts of interest, leading to policy choices that may not prioritize ethical service delivery. This can manifest as over-provision, non-standard services, or diminished quality of care. Economic constraints pose another critical dilemma, characterized by inadequate health expenditure as a proportion of gross domestic product (GDP). This limits equitable access to healthcare and exacerbates inequities in resource distribution. A prime example is the neglect of the network-based health system, favoring hosp ital-centric development and an overemphasis on specialized care over comprehensive primary care. Determining the appropriate model for the health system – enterprise-driven or governance-oriented – presents a fundamental conflict. This choice significantly influences health policy decisions. Furthermore, the simultaneous role of policymakers as both providers and purchasers of healthcare services fuels conflicts of interest and incentivizes "induced demand."Shifting towards an ethical perspective in health system policymaking requires a systemic and comprehensive approach. Incorporating ethical considerations into policy decisions, recognizing the unique characteristics of the health market, and addressing conflicts of interest are crucial for improving system performance. This approach would likely prioritize network-based care, strengthen primary care, enhance referral systems, develop a robust primary care workforce, and elevate the importance of health education within the system.
Masoomeh Salehi, Behzad Imani, Shirdel Zandi,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics (Posters) 2024)
Abstract
The diversity of work environments, regulations, and prevailing atmospheres uniquely influence individuals' moral intelligence. Given the significant role of operating room nurses in patient care and the importance of moral intelligence in enhancing the quality of these services, this study aimed to elucidate the experiences of operating room nurses regarding moral intelligence at Hamadan University of Medical Sciences. A hermeneutic phenomenological study was conducted in hospitals affiliated with Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Iran, from May to October 2023. Twelve operating room nurses were purposefully selected. Data was collected through in-depth semi-structured interviews and analyzed using van Manen's method. The study's rigor was ensured through four criteria: credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability. Three main themes related to moral intelligence were identified by examining the experiences of operating room nurses. These themes include: moral sensitivity (inner guidance, recognizing the rightness or wrongness of actions, having a work ethic), the ability to make sound decisions (ability to make sound judgments, moral courage), and ethical behavior towards patient interests (providing ethical care, preserving patient dignity, ability to work as a team). Operating room nurses with high moral intelligence are sensitive to the rightness or wrongness of actions, guided by inner ideals and professional commitment to doing what is right. They make sound judgments when faced with challenges and defend them courageously, making sound decisions. By providing ethical care, working as a team, and protecting human dignity, they demonstrate ethical behavior towards patient interests.
Reza Salehinia, Marzieh Nasiri Sangari, Hossein Abbasian, Sajjad Salehian,
Volume 17, Issue 0 (Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics (Posters) 2024)
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) represents a significant human advancement. The proliferation of AI technologies within the healthcare sector has led to substantial improvements in health outcomes and medical indicators. However, the application of AI in healthcare is accompanied by numerous ethical challenges. This study aimed to investigate the ethical considerations associated with the use of AI in the healthcare domain. This narrative review included articles published between February 2019 and November 2024. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across internal databases, including Magiran and SID, as well as external scientific databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Keywords used for the search included "Ethics," "Artificial Intelligence," and "Health" in both Persian and English. After applying inclusion criteria and conducting quality assessments, nine studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in this review. The findings of previous studies demonstrate that the utilization of AI in healthcare has yielded significant benefits, including more accurate disease diagnoses, improved clinical predictions, more efficient hospital management, optimized resource allocation, enhanced patient care, streamlined clinical workflows, and advancements in medical research. These technologies have contributed to increased efficiency and quality within healthcare services. However, significant ethical challenges remain, including data privacy and security concerns, algorithmic bias, transparency issues, the need for robust clinical validation, and the importance of ensuring professional responsibility. Adherence to principles such as transparency, fairness, privacy protection, and equitable access is crucial for the responsible development and deployment of AI in healthcare. Ultimately, achieving a balance between technological advancements and human values is paramount for the sustainable and ethical utilization of AI in this domain. The findings of this review underscore the profound impact of AI on improving quality of life and enhancing services across various sectors, particularly healthcare, by providing innovative solutions. However, the optimal utilization of AI in healthcare necessitates a meticulous consideration of ethical implications, rigorous monitoring of AI systems, and proactive efforts to address the existing challenges.
Shahrbanoo Salehin,
Volume 17, Issue 1 (3-2024)
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is a public health emergency that has challenged many ethical issues. This study aimed to investigate the challenges and considerations of midwifery professional ethics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Employing qualitative content analysis, raw data were collected through an extensive literature review, utilizing purposive sampling until data saturation was achieved. Data trustworthiness was ensured based on Lincoln and Guba's criteria and data were analyzed using an inductive method. A total of 4 themes and 17 main categories were extracted. The themes and categories included: 1. Ethical challenges in deciding on midwifery care and place of delivery (ethical challenges of home birth, ethical challenges of hospital delivery, facing ethical challenges), 2. Clinical ethical principles (beneficence, equitable distribution and justice, solidarity, trust, duty to care), 3. Ethical principles in management (equal concern and respect, minimizing harm caused by the pandemic, inter-sectoral cooperation, evidence-based decision-making), 4. Support for midwives' rights (psychological support for midwives, gender considerations among midwives, midwifery training, workplace health, support policies). Midwives encounter various ethical challenges in pandemics. Thus, developing an ethical framework for decision-making in pandemics can help address these challenges.