Showing 7 results for Namazi
Fatemeh Khansari, Hamidreza Namazi,
Volume 3, Issue 5 (12-2010)
Abstract
Hamidreza Namazi,
Volume 5, Issue 1 (3-2012)
Abstract
In medical etiquette and ethics, benefit and harm assessment includes risk evaluation, rational risk, distinction between medical and non medical utilitarian considerations, individual and community benefit ratio, and issues of the like.
This article explores philosophical foundations of this issue. In philosophy, benefit/harm reduces to pleasure/pain and good/bad. Pleasure (spiritual and non-spiritual) is considered a subjective criterion for benefit, whereas applied ethics needs an objective criterion. To achieve such a criterion, we need a specific model for casuistry evaluation and a holistic and organic approach. This article advocates the public sphere model and presumes it is the missing link of ethical confusions and the solution to ethics lack of quantifiability. Public sphere sits between public authority and private sphere, and supervises them impartially. Benefit/harm evaluation components in medical research requires such sphere for clarity and distinction.
Hamid Reza Namazi, Nafiseh Momeni,
Volume 12, Issue 0 (3-2019)
Abstract
Over the past years in the literature of medical ethics about the doctor-patient relationship, patient's rights have been greatly considered, but the other side of this relationship is not concerned, and the physician’s obligations have been highlighted. The two meanings are understood from the concept of physicians’ rights; their rights in conflict with the patient rights’ and the right to self improvement. We want to review the causes of this neglect and its complications. The reasons for not paying attention to the physician’s rights include: traditional beliefs about the power imbalance in doctor-patient relationship, lack of emphasis in the four principles of medical ethics, lack of supportive structures, customer-orientation in medicine, and hyper medical professionalism. Continuing this neglect creates complications that include: physicians’ work-life imbalance, symbolic violence in their society, burnout of physicians, forgetting the principle of gratitude and ultimately, the lack of respect for patients' rights. Consequently, the discourse of medical ethics fails to achieve its primary goals.
Mohammad Kiasalar, Hamidreza Namazi,
Volume 13, Issue 0 (3-2020)
Abstract
The National Medical Ethics Film & Photo Festival was held in February 2020 and ended with the registration of 487 works which 80 films and 36 photographs of them were finally selected and peer reviewed. The present article focuses on the films of this festival and tries to explain the experience of attracting, selecting, and judging films through the design and holding a festival by using action research method. The article, also, tries to analyze the selected films (50 documentaries, 20 short films, and 10 unspecified films) from medical ethics point of view. In this way, the thematic adaptation of the selected films with 16 topics declared by the festival has been used. One of the obvious findings of this study is the difference between the views of filmmakers and experts on medical ethics. This difference becomes more significant when we see that the number of films related to the 16 topics declared by the experts is one less than the number of the films that the filmmakers made and submitted to the festival on the 7 topics neglected in the text of the call. It seems that the camera of filmmakers in the field of medical ethics mainly focuses on the commitment of professionals and the vulnerability of patients. On the other hand, considering the number and variety of films in the festival, another finding of this study can be considered as the possibility of using short and documentary films to teach some concepts of medical ethics to medical students.
Amirahmad Shojaee, Fazlollah Hasanvand, Hamidreza Namazi, Mojtaba Parsa, Kobra Rashidi,
Volume 16, Issue 1 (3-2023)
Abstract
Professional ethics is based on human values, tasks, rights and responsibilities and affects the professional and organizational conditions of nurses. In this regard, the aim of this study was identifying framework of the dimensions of nurses' professional ethics from the point of view their and physicians. This study was done with qualitative method, using semi-structured interview, with the participation of 26 physicians medical ethics specialist, clinical specialist, clinical assistant and intern and 20 nurses based on theoretical saturation with the purposeful sampling method and after obtaining informed consent from them. Content analysis method was used for data analysis, which was done in MAXQDA version 18 software. Findings showed professional ethics was based on a four-dimensional framework; The professional ethics of nurses in relation to the patient (six sub-components), in relation to colleagues in different job categories (four sub-components), in relation to the profession (three sub-components) and in relation to the hospital and medical organizations (two sub-components). The reliability of the coding of the components was obtained based on the Kappa index equal to 0.88. Therefore, it can be said. Framework of the dimensions professional ethics of the point of view of nurses found meaning in relation to themselves and others (patients, colleagues, organization and profession). The nurses, knowing and observing the details and nature of these communications, as well as the individual rights of these people from their own point of view; they can properly implement the principles of professional ethics in advancing the goals of the organization and increasing the quality of service provision and the satisfaction of others and raising the status of the profession.
Mahsima Abdoli, Hamidreza Namazi,
Volume 17, Issue 1 (3-2024)
Abstract
Recognizing diseases and their causes is one of the most critical issues in medicine, forming the foundation of treatment. Disease responses and complications might differ among individuals, with some exhibiting more resistance to certain illnesses due to genetic or environmental factors. Furthermore, we are currently witnessing the emergence of new diseases for which definitive treatments have yet to be developed. This evidently underscores the need to explore the fundamental causes of diseases. Evolutionary medicine has been discussed in Western medical discourse for less than half a century. Grounded in Darwinian principles, this theory examines the issues humans have faced, both naturally and as influenced by social conditions, throughout our evolutionary history. Research in evolutionary medicine indicates that human health and illness are shaped not only by immediate biological and environmental factors but also by the long history of human evolution and the transformations that have occurred over time. Accordingly, this study introduced 13 key indices of evolutionary medicine, highlighting its significance and application in medicine and healthcare. Moreover, it emphasized the necessity for greater attention to this concept from both medical science and interdisciplinary perspectives.
Hamidreza Namazi, Navid Ravan,
Volume 17, Issue 1 (3-2024)
Abstract
Medical considerations about aging are as old as medicine itself. However, due to the controversy about whether aging should be classified as a disease or merely a stage of life, geriatric medicine was separated from medicine with a considerable lag. The differentiation of geriatrics from other medical specialties is not rooted in subjecting a specific organ of the body or specific pathophysiological processes but based on a particular stage of life. On the other hand, different stages of life, such as old age, are also subjects for medicalization. Therefore, geriatric medicine may sometimes be threatened by geriatric medicalization and its associated harms. In addition, the relativity and ambiguity in defining the concept of aging and its dependence on social contexts can lead to confusion in understanding the subject matter of geriatric medicine. Mitigating these harms requires philosophical and ethical reflection on health and disease concepts as well as on the essence of aging. Considering that Iran is expected to face an aging crisis in the coming decades, this philosophical reflection at different levels among researchers in the philosophy of medicine and medical ethics, researchers and practitioners in geriatrics, as well as among civil society, can lead to separating geriatric medicine from geriatric medicalization, hence increasing the integrity and efficiency of geriatric medicine, and promoting the health status of the elderly.
