Showing 6 results for Azizi
Maryam Azizi, Somayyeh Mahroozadeh, Nazila Nikravan,
Volume 1, Issue 3 (9-2008)
Abstract
Maryam Azizi, Pooneh Salari, Somayeh Mahroozadeh,
Volume 2, Issue 1 (4-2009)
Abstract
Maryam Azizi, Pooneh Salari ,
Volume 2, Issue 2 (5-2009)
Abstract
Zahra Sadat Manzari, Easa Mohammadi, Abbas Heidari, Hamidreza Aghamohammadian Sherbaf, Mohammad Jafar Modabber Azizi, Ebrahim Khaleghi,
Volume 4, Issue 6 (12-2011)
Abstract
The aim of this study was to explore experiences of family members of patients confronting brain death diagnosis and the request for organ donation.
A qualitative study was designed focusing on content analysis. Data collection process included 38 unstructured in- depth interviews with relatives of 26 brain death patients who were candidate for organ donation and field notes. Sampling method began as purposive and continued as theoretical until saturation.
Five main themes were extracted from the current dataset that indicated family experiences and perceptions of brain death concept while being informed. The themes were included internal conflict, internal barriers against external realities, imminent sense of loss and grief, surrender and acceptance.
The results showed that facing the diagnosis of brain death for relatives and family members is a condition surrounded by many challenges, ambiguities and conflicts that is become more complicated when emotional responses related to grieving and defensive psychological reactions emerge. So it is recommended before any organ request, at first medical team provide conditions for brain death acceptance. Respecting family members experiences and their perceptions about the situation will resolve their internal ambiguities and conflicts. At this situation requesting organ donation seems to be rational.
Mohammad Hossein Asgardoon, Sepehr Azizi, Azin Ebrahimi, Mohammad Hossein Ahmadian,
Volume 12, Issue 0 (3-2019)
Abstract
Several definitions for medical futility has been proposed in the literature. Medical futility is defined as the condition in which an intervention, either for diagnosis, prevention, treatment, rehabilitation or other medical goals, has no benefit for the individual patient. This critical review aimed to increase the understanding of physicians and other healthcare providers on the issue of futility in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). Our comprehensive search resulted in more than 1000 studies; unrelated studies were excluded by title and abstract screening, then 219 full-texts were read and finally, 118 studies were included. The conclusion concerning whether or not it is morally acceptable to provide a futile treatment in CAM, becomes a controversial issue based on different approaches. Using futile treatments is not acceptable according to the duty-based approach, and the principle of justice. In contrast, the case-based approach and the principle of autonomy of the patient, hold that such treatments could be morally acceptable. Based on utilitarianism, only evidence-based treatments can be morally discussed, and those CAM therapies that have been shown to be futile, should be prohibited; thus health care providers must not offer them to patients since it would be a kind of deceit. We suggest that more comprehensive studies should be performed to clarify the boundary between placebo, nocebo, and futility.
Samaneh Azizi, Ahmad Reza Mohtadi, Mahdi Bijanzadeh,
Volume 14, Issue 0 (3-2021)
Abstract
The relationship between physicians and operating room staff includes interaction between them in caring for the patient to achieve a common therapeutic goal and condition improvement. Present cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study aimed to examine viewpoints of physicians and operating room staff about their relationship in Ahvaz at 2019. The research samples were operating room staff and physicians working in three educational hospitals affiliated to Ahwaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences. Consecutive samples were icluded in the study. The research tool was a two-part questionnaire including socio-demographic information and questions about the professional relationship between the doctors and the operating room staff. Results showed that viewpoints of physicians and operating room staff about respecting ethics in their communications are good. In the group of physicians, 18.1% had a moderate viewpoint and 81.9% had a good viewpoint about communication with operating room staff. Among the operating room staff group, 4.8 percent had a bad viewpoint, 27.3 percent had a moderate viewpoint, and 67.9 percent had a good view point about their communication with physicians. Until reaching highest level of respecting professional ethics, any attempt to improve communication between physicians and operating room staff will result in positive outcomes for physicians and staff, and promote quality of their care for patients.
