Volume 17 - Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics
IJMEHM 2024, 17 - Supplement of 11th Annual Iranian Congress of Medical Ethics : 1-2 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Tahmasebi M. Avoidable Suffering at the End of Life. IJMEHM 2024; 17 (S1) :1-2
URL: http://ijme.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6922-en.html
URL: http://ijme.tums.ac.ir/article-1-6922-en.html
Associate Professor, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (995 Views)
Avoidable suffering at the end of life refers to the unnecessary pain and distress experienced by individuals with terminal illnesses—pain that can often be alleviated through effective palliative care practices. Addressing this issue is critical for improving the quality of life for both patients and their families during this challenging period. The recognition of holistic care, which considers physical, emotional, spiritual, and social needs, has fueled efforts to enhance end-of-life care to reduce suffering and uphold patients' autonomy. Numerous studies indicate that many terminally ill patients endure avoidable physical and emotional pain as they approach death, highlighting gaps in healthcare delivery. For instance, research from the National Center for Health Statistics reveals that a significant number of hospice patients report unmanaged pain despite the availability of effective interventions. Psychological distress, including anxiety and depression, is also prevalent among terminally ill patients, underscoring the need for comprehensive care that integrates mental health support. Furthermore, neglecting spiritual and social needs can leave patients feeling isolated and despairing, exacerbating their suffering. Ethical considerations in pain management at the end of life remain a subject of debate, particularly concerning the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence. The principle of double effect, which permits actions to relieve suffering even if they may unintentionally hasten death, continues to spark controversy among healthcare providers, patients, and families. Additionally, ethical dilemmas arise in advanced care planning, particularly in respecting patient autonomy while navigating complex end-of-life decisions. Addressing avoidable suffering at the end of life requires a multidisciplinary approach that honors patients' values and preferences while striving to minimize unnecessary distress. As research and clinical practices advance, healthcare systems must prioritize strategies to reduce avoidable suffering and ensure patients' dignity during their final days.
Type of Study: Oral Presentation |
Subject:
Health Ethics Congress (11th) - Oral Presentation
Received: 2025/05/7 | Revised: 2026/01/12 | Accepted: 2024/12/22 | Published: 2024/12/22
Received: 2025/05/7 | Revised: 2026/01/12 | Accepted: 2024/12/22 | Published: 2024/12/22
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
