1- Associate Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran
2- Ph.D. Student of Criminology Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University, Mmashhad, Iran
3- Associate Professor, Forensic Medicine Organization, Mashhad, Iran
4- Lecturer, Department of Law, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran
Abstract: (1585 Views)
Efforts of the medical staff are to provide efficient, desirable, and high quality services to patients. However, medical treatments are not immune to error and mistake. So, occurrence of injury following medical managements is inevitable, an issue that could lead to a lawsuit against the medical staff. In such cases, resorting to experts’ opinion is necessary. Therefore, knowledge about effective indicators in sentencing can increase awareness of the treatment staff in addition to reduction of traumatic behaviors. Reflection on the medical forensic cases shows that the reasons of medic’s conviction can be divided in two categories including pre-treatment and post-treatment factors. Errors after entering the treatment process indicate post-treatment index. Breach at the end of treatment, not doing (lack of) treatment in the appropriate place, mismatch or mistake of used techniques, and fault or blunder are the most important issues related to this index. The present study intends to examine the effective criteria in sentencing medical staff in a descriptive-analytical manner based on expert opinions’ of medical malpractice cases.
Type of Study:
Research |
Subject:
Madical law Received: 2020/06/1 | Accepted: 2020/03/20 | Published: 2020/03/20